Large firms typically use a variety of structures to manage their Essay

Large firms typically use a variety of social organizations to manage their organisation. tell and evaluate the emoluments and disadv - Essay ExampleGood decision making in an organization is because of good intercourse between members of the organization a virtue that is determined by the organizations twist. This essay tries to take the different types of organizational structures and gives the advantages and disadvantages of each of them. It also evaluates the different structures to come up with the roughly preferable structure in terms of ensuring a business success. The first type of organizations structure is a vertical structure. It is a structure whereby the business leaders or managers feature at the top season the bottom features the otherwise employers. This structure can be either concentrate or decentralized. For a centralized system, the organizations members at the center of the structure make most of the decisions while, for a decentralized structure, most of the decisions are made by the members at the ends of the chain of the organization (Mills, 2007 p 54). The main advantage of this structure is its easiness in designating duties to the lower level employees. It forms a chain structure that can be followed without difficulty. The other advantage is that it promotes efficiency in the organization. Equally important is that, it encourages the development of skills and expertise as employees find it indulgent to go for further learning activities. The disadvantage of this stated structure is that it requires extensive power and effort to hold back order, balance, and power. It also narrows a departments aims and objectives not to reflect the overall companys goals (Mills, 2007 p 58). The next type of organizational structure is horizontal structure. This one differs from the vertical structure such that in that location are few power levels. A single department can oversee a consider of activities in the same level without necess arily going to the next level. It has the advantage of giving employers greater liberty thusly good turnaround and employee satisfaction. It can help create competition in the different organizations hence innovation and creativity. There is also easy communication and cooperation between the departments. The disadvantage of this structure is its creation of subject management the managers have little say over their employers due to tight schedules of meeting targets and finishing work. In addition, this is attributed to managers and workers maintaining a peer-to-peer relationship at the place of work hence no respect for leaders (Mills, 2007 p 89). Following on is the functional structure. In this type of structure, employees and departments are put into groups according to the function they play. The advantage of functional structure entails the help it has in growing specialists people of the same skills are sort out in the same department. It also helps change skills of empl oyees, as the poor ones will learn from the better ones since they are grouped in the same department. Grouping skills of the same nature at one place also helps improve performance. This is mainly through combined efforts of doing a task by many employees. It also boosts employees morale, as an employee has to do his best since it is his area of specialization according to the grouping. The main disadvantage of functional structure involves its multiform decision-making and communication processes. Communication between the different departments to enable the completion of a task is difficult since